Mars Q&A
Q: How long would it take to make a phone call from Mars to Earth? -
Ben Bern
A: It takes a signal 12-20 minutes to travel each way, which is not
practical for a phone call. However, currently it is impossible to send a signal
to Mars when it is on the other side of the sun. Communication with Mars will
need to be done by sending recorded “letters” (video, voice, written) and later
receiving a reply in a similar way. - Daniel Slosberg
Q: When man begins the process of terraforming Mars there will most likely
be protestors that want to keep Mars as it is. How will we cope with that?
- Brett
A: When terraforming Mars is seriously proposed by Martian settlers
this century I predict that debate will rage all over both planets. Personally
I believe that terraforming will go ahead anyway by the settlers that will benefit
from it but compromises can be made; one of many ideas is to have a height limit:
anything above six kilometers above datum can be left near pristine while lower
altitudes can enjoy tolerable pressures and temperatures. In the end it will
most likely be up to the Martians to decide, and their vested interest will
likely be more terraforming oriented. - Felix
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
Q: Could the idea of using light craft to go to Mars become a reality? If
I were to use a light craft to get to Mars, I would put the laser that emits
the light to the craft on the bottom of the craft. The laser would not get weaker
as the space vessel gets further away from the laser source. Have people thought
about using light craft as space travel to Mars, and can the laser be attached
to the space vehicle instead of the space station? - Andy Staudacher
A: In principle, any mission beyond Earth’s orbit could be powered by
a “light craft” propulsion system, but the major problem is that we do not have
the kinds of lasers that would be needed to power such a craft. These lasers
would have to be incredibly powerful, practically “Death Star” lasers and would
therefore require not only enormous construction facilities in space, but also
an incredible power source. The biggest problem with placing the laser on the
ship traveling to Mars would be that the laser would have to be huge, and require
a vast energy source. If we consider where this energy were to come from, there
are really only two possibilities: a nuclear reactor, either fission or fusion,
or perhaps controlled micro antimatter detonations. However, if we were able
to build these types of reactors, it would be much easier to just use them as
a means of propulsion by themselves, rather than tie them into a massive laser.
For example, fission reactor engine prototypes in the 70s used the fission of
uranium or plutonium to heat up hydrogen gas until it is in a plasma state (all
the electrons are sheared off) and then expel it through a nozzle at the back
of the ship, thereby producing thrust.
Unfortunately, one of the main reasons we have not actively pursued nuclear
power technology for space missions is the possible explosion and crash of the
rocket during takeoff, thereby spreading radioactive debris over large areas
of the Earth and creating an ecological disaster. In other words, while light
craft and other forms of exotic propulsion are in principle feasible, we will
make many flights using conventional chemical rockets to Mars before we have
the infrastructure to construct exotic and perhaps more efficient propulsion
systems. - Luke Colby
Ask a Mars question and it will be
answered in the next issue of The Martian Chronicles!
|